A new working paper from Khahlil Louisy examines whether AI-based urban infrastructure monitoring can address equity gaps in public health surveillance, using evidence from Boston’s 311 complaint system and AI-detected pavement data. The paper shows that complaint-based systems reflect socioeconomic patterns of civic participation, and argues that AI can complement but not replace participatory surveillance without rigorous validation and equity safeguards.

An analysis of roughly 187,000 citizen reports and nearly 5,000 computer vision detections in Jamaica Plain, MA shows why cities need both perspectives and raises critical questions about who gets heard.

The time for conversation has long passed given that the evidence is clear, the tools exist, and the urgency is undeniable. Cities must stop theorizing about innovation partnerships and start creating the regulatory architecture that makes them possible at scale. One such architecture is the regulatory sandbox and the data proves it works.

Municipalities are deploying artificial intelligence faster than they can govern it and the consequences reach every resident.

Along the 215 miles connecting Boston and New York City runs one of the world's most concentrated pathways of intellectual capital, research infrastructure, and innovation capacity. Yet this corridor has largely functioned as a collection of distinct regional ecosystems rather than as an integrated system. The question is no longer whether these cities can innovate independently—they demonstrably can, but by how much can their collective impact on society’s most pressing chal

From Summer Student to Clinical Research Professional: How PII's Summer Program Changed Everything

PII Named Associate Partner in new €2 million EU-Funded Justice in Healthcare AI Initiative